Additional information
by William Lane Craig (Author), Adam Lloyd Johnson (Editor), Erik J. Wielenberg (Author)
Philosophers William Lane Craig (a theist) and Erik J. Wielenberg (an athiest) debate whether theism or secularism provides the best account of objective moral values and duties. Five more leading philosophers in the field then respond.
Author Biography
DebatersErik J. Wielenberg is Professor of Philosophy at DePauw University and is the author of Value and Virtue in a Godless Universe (2005), God and the Reach of Reason: C.S. Lewis, David Hume, and Bertrand Russell (2007); and Robust Ethics: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Godless Normative Realism (2014).
William Lane Craig is Professor of Philosophy at the Talbot School of Theology and Houston Baptist University. He has authored or edited more than forty books, including, Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom (1990), Theism, Atheism, and Big Bang Cosmology (with Quentin Smith, 1995), The Kalam Cosmological Argument (2000), God, Time, and Eternity (2001), and God Over All (2016).
EditorAdam Lloyd Johnson is a Ph.D. student at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary.
Contributors
P. Moreland, David Baggett, Mark Linville, Wes Morriston, and Michael Huemer
