Additional information
by Taner Edis (Author)
How is Islam adapting to the rapid changes of the 21st century? Despite political unrest and terrorism, the author argues that many Muslim societies are successfully developing their own versions of modern life. In contrast to the secular liberal model that prevails in the West, Islam is demonstrating alternative ways to be modern while maintaining a distinctly Muslim worldview. Professor Edis, an American physicist with a secular viewpoint who was raised in Turkey, is uniquely qualified to evaluate the interplay of modern trends and Islamic values. He devotes separate chapters to prominent examples of what he calls Islam's "pious modernity." For instance, while most Muslim societies embrace the applied sciences and technology, they are cooler toward aspects of science with materialist implications. They are also enthusiastically adopting a market economy and consumerism, while preserving Muslim religious values. Even in such controversial areas as multiculturalism, individual human rights, freedom of speech, and gender roles, the author shows that Muslim societies are drawn toward a flexible conservatism. He critically evaluates attempts to import Western political and cultural notions into Muslim societies and draws interesting parallels between conservative Christian reactions to secular society and similar responses in Islam.This balanced overview of Islam's relationship with the modern world will be of interest to open-minded readers in both the West and the East.
Author Biography
Taner Edis, professor of physics at Truman State University, is the author of An Illusion of Harmony: Science and Religion in Islam; Science and Nonbelief; and The Ghost in the Universe: God in Light of Modern Science, which was the recipient of the Morris D. Forkosch award for best humanist book of 2002 from the Council for Secular Humanism. He has also published numerous journal articles and book chapters and is the editor with Matt Young of Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism.
