Additional information
by Philip Mauro (Author)
"Which Version? Authorized or Revised?" provides a rigorous and analytical examination of the differences between the historic Authorized Version (King James Bible) and the Revised Version of the late 19th century. Written by Philip Mauro, a legal professional and theologian known for his logical precision, this work addresses the critical debate surrounding the accuracy and integrity of English Bible translations. Mauro meticulously compares the two versions, evaluating the underlying manuscripts and the translation philosophies that guided the respective committees.
The book serves as an essential resource for those interested in biblical textual criticism and the historical preservation of scripture. Mauro argues for the clarity and doctrinal strength of the "Authorized Version", highlighting instances where he believes the "Revised Version" introduces ambiguity or weakens fundamental Christian tenets. Through his clear and systematic approach, he offers readers a comprehensive look at how specific translation choices can impact the transmission of the biblical message. "Which Version? Authorized or Revised?" remains a significant contribution to the study of bibliology, offering a spirited defense of traditional English scripture during a pivotal era of modern translation efforts.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you may see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
